#Paint.net cameyo software
Instead of a review of the software, which we know already, I would like to address Maxim Gapchenko:ĭear Mr Gapchenko, in your software description you write:īatch removal of typical objects from images is what Batch Inpaint is designed for. We had several versions of Inpaint in the past: Maxim Gapchenko is regularly participating here with good products.
#Paint.net cameyo 64 Bit
Installed and registered without problems on a Win 8.1.3 Pro 64 bit system.Ī (Russian) company without name and address, focusing on photo manipulation and removing unwanted objects.
Whilst mathematician Boqing Gong of the Computer Science Department at the University of Southern California has a nice little "image resizing" project blog in which the pioneering algorithm work of Ariel Shamir and Shai Avidan is given the recognition it deserves (yet all too rarely receives) here: If any GOTDer is interested in discovering more about the genesis of the stuff Teorex sells commercially, Wikipedia has an accurate article on the "seam carving algorithm" here: Most if not all Teorex software originates from academic research undertaken by the Open Source scientific community iResizer is no different. Not sure if I followed you there, but anyway: iResizer is a $19.99 app from the same developer as today's batch Inpaint. Iresizer which I did not know was still available for free, is a different type of program that is both interesting and useful. So, in my view, INPAINT is more than enough for 99% of people here and elsewhere!!
#Paint.net cameyo professional
Usually, unlike you are a professional photographer, the average home user doesn’t have tons of pictures with unwanted persons or objects accidentally caught by his/her camera. But do we really need a program like this? INPAINT is already a great product and as I can see BATCHINPAINT is even better, since it gives you the ability to process several pics in batch.
Thanks, then, GOTD, and Teorex, but no thanks.
Some software really shouldn't be tinkered with, and especially not to make a change for the worse. Unfortunately, the latest version is a classic case of over-development, resulting in the abandonment of the quick 'n simple press-Shift-mouse-click-on-sizing-handle to change a pixel capture area in favour of a hapless "double painting" process which requires both the object and the surrounding capture area to be brushed over. Total gibberish: batch processing of multiple images only works if pixels of the exact same extent appear in the exact same location in each individual image.īatchInPaint is simply a commercial product that does nothing which existing freeware doesn't already do in terms of removing logos, camera time-stamps, copyright warnings etc that appear in the same place in different pictures.Īs to Giovanni's endorsement of InPaint (non-batch version), I agree, it's a handy little app, and I'm happy to have paid for an earlier version. But then, it has to, because there ain't no such thing as a "batch processor" for the kind of work Teorex cites because there is no software anywhere intelligent enough to say, in effect, hey, I'll clean up the wrinkles on that lady standing bottom left on picture 1 and then proceed automatically to picture 2 where I'll do the same for the wrinkles on the lady at top right. Like Karl at #8, I find it irritating that the developer proclaims one thing in large type and then disavows it in small type. Thanks GOTD!ĭespite these gripes, this program does the job quickly and well. Is it hard to include such things as setting default directories and, of course, the option to save at 100% quality?ĭespite these gripes, this program does the job quickly and well. Question: does anybody ever want to save their photos at less than 100% quality? Anybody? Why isn’t the default set to 100%?Īs is too often the case with products from this company, there is no option to set defaults. I often use desktop for temporary file manipulation because it's usually easy to find in navigation panes. Also, the navigation pane doesn't show desktop. If I could set the default folder I would be very happy. That means that every single time I use it I have to navigate away from that and to the folder I want. One very big gripe is that “open folder only” always starts in …libraries/photos. I discovered that pictures in landscape mode must be processed separately from those in portrait because the watermark you want to remove is in a different place.
0 kommentar(er)
